![]() ![]() The self-defined measure's sensitivity to correctly identify MBI-assessed burnout was 50.4% for clinicians and 58.6% for staff specificity was 94.7% for clinicians and 92.3% for staff. In contrast, 29% of clinicians (95% CI: 25-33%) and 31% of staff (95% CI: 28-35%) reported "definitely burning out" or more severe symptoms on the self-defined burnout measure. Similar to other nationally representative burnout estimates, 52% of clinicians (95% CI: 47-57%) and 46% of staff (95% CI: 42-50%) reported high MBI emotional exhaustion or high MBI cynicism. (J Am Board Fam Med 27(2):229-38, 2014) and a standard question about workplace atmosphere as reported by Rassolian et al. Concurrent validity was assessed using a validated, 7-item team culture scale as reported by Willard-Grace et al. The MBI measure, calculated from a high score on either the emotional exhaustion or cynicism subscale, and a single-item measure of self-defined burnout. To identify the sensitivity, specificity, and concurrent validity of the self-defined burnout measure compared to the more established MBI measure.Ĭross-sectional survey (November 2016-January 2017).įour hundred forty-four primary care clinicians and 606 staff from three San Francisco Aarea healthcare systems. ![]() Relatively little is known about how the measures compare. Two common burnout assessments are the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and a single-item, self-defined burnout measure. Clinicians and healthcare staff report high levels of burnout. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |